Talk:Something There/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Luthien22 (talk · contribs) 21:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Happy to review another article nominated by

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * As always, excellent.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * No issues.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * There is a hefty references section.
 * B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
 * Excellent references. No use of blogs, and many uses of academic sources and books. I'm surprised you were able to find this many good sources.
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Covers almost every aspect of the song, including composition, performance, and reception. This article could probably benefit from a little bit more coverage on its use in the Broadway production, but since it's not a major part of that show, the current coverage is perfectly fine if you can't find anything more.
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * Very stable. As always for Disney articles, I recommend staying extra alert for possible vandalism or non encyclopedic good faith edits, as these articles are more prone to attract that.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * As on the last GA I conducted on a song article, I also counted sound files under this category. Both files, the image and the sound file, are properly licensed.
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * The one image provided is sufficient, and the 20 second sound file is also sufficient.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This was an easy article to pass. Nice job, all editors.
 * Woooowwww well that was quick and painless, lol. Thank you so much!!!--Changedforbetter (talk) 23:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This was an easy article to pass. Nice job, all editors.
 * Woooowwww well that was quick and painless, lol. Thank you so much!!!--Changedforbetter (talk) 23:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)