Talk:Something old

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://ask.yahoo.com/20031027.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Joe Roe (talk) 19:11, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

...and a silver sixpence in her shoe
I was curious as to why the final line of the rhyme was removed fairly recently. It's only given a passing mention now in the article and no one has reverted the change or given an explanation as to why it was removed as far as I can see. --81.108.69.166 (talk) 13:29, 31 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I have restored the missing text. Andrew D. (talk) 07:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)


 * For the record, I think this line is worth mentioning, but seeing as it was added later and has since fallen into disuse, it should probably just be mentioned separately that this line is sometimes added with the information already included about it in the article. The way it is presented now makes an implication that it is integral and original, but that is obviously not the case, as evidenced by the fact that none of the given examples make mention of a sixpence and according to the article, it was added later. Idisestablish (talk) 13:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Popular culture
This section is a list of trivial instances where the theme is mentioned, appearing to violate WP:In popular culture's admonition: "passing mentions of the subject in books, television or film dialogue, or song lyrics should be included only when that mention's significance is itself demonstrated with secondary sources". Is there any reason to keep any of this? Cl ea n Co py talk 12:33, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Something old is itself part and parcel of popular culture. I can’t imagine popular culture restrictions applying as stringently to something falling purely with in that field. Pandeist (talk) 03:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Someone put a R to song template above indidate that song title(s) redirect to the article. As this also seems to happen with other types of media too, we should accommodate such references.  If they get disorganised or lengthy, then we just consolidate and tidy. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:15, 18 February 2020 (UTC)