Talk:Songs, sketches and monologues of Dan Leno/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 23:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
 * B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * This is essentially a list. Therefore it's not eligible for GA
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Provides references to all sources:
 * B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Main aspects are addressed:
 * B. Remains focused:
 * 1) Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I'm very sorry but this article is a list; it violates list incorporation. It is a quick fail. I don't think putting it on hold for seven days is enough time to fix it. Sorry, MathewTownsend (talk) 23:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I'm very sorry but this article is a list; it violates list incorporation. It is a quick fail. I don't think putting it on hold for seven days is enough time to fix it. Sorry, MathewTownsend (talk) 23:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I'm very sorry but this article is a list; it violates list incorporation. It is a quick fail. I don't think putting it on hold for seven days is enough time to fix it. Sorry, MathewTownsend (talk) 23:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm very sorry but this article is a list; it violates list incorporation. It is a quick fail. I don't think putting it on hold for seven days is enough time to fix it. Sorry, MathewTownsend (talk) 23:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm very sorry but this article is a list; it violates list incorporation. It is a quick fail. I don't think putting it on hold for seven days is enough time to fix it. Sorry, MathewTownsend (talk) 23:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * That's because it was the wrong one, it should have been Dan Leno, which I will be adding tomorrow. -- Cassianto (talk) 01:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * ok, that seems good! MathewTownsend (talk) 01:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)