Talk:Songs About Jane

Credits
Article needs musician/mixing/mastering credits. It's pretty cool that Rashida Jones did backup, would be nice to see that section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.35.67.130 (talk) 15:57, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Other songs
I Took the song "NOT FALLINIG APART" off Becuse it appears on the new cd
 * No, this is a different song. "Not Falling Apart" cannot be confused with the other "Not Falling Apart" which is on the second album. Someone had the title wrong though: it is called "Hold On" (A google search will give you the lyrics, which include the refrain that goes "Hold on, hold on, hold on / I'm not falling apart") I'll add it back... - 144.118.202.64 (talk) 19:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Import Version
I think it should be mentioned, I actually just ordered the import version from CD Universe. I'm confused exactly what country it is from though. CD Universe says BMG Argentina, but Oreos is saying that their copy is from New Zealand. I'll wait until my copy arrives. Valmor 00:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

I added the information on the import release. Valmor 00:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Maybe the word import should not be used at all. One can not assume that the reader lives in any specific country. Just write that the track can be found on the New Zeeland release. 6 June 2007 81.227.8.228 11:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Rag Doll + the Other Songs?
When I bought Songs about Jane, I got the | import copy, which apparently is the deluxe or something. (Note that I live in the US :P) Shouldn't the track listing for this be mentioned? (I guess it is from New Zealand, because on the back of the CD it says 'distributed by BMG New Zealand limited. made in New Zealand'. If it should be mentioned, the track listing should be on the Amazon listing. Just wanted to mention it. --Oreos 22:31, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Sales?
Does anyone know, i know it is over 6.5million worldwide

Yeah did you see how they tracked Madonnas new cd, wheres the europe sales here.

Copyright issues
Wikipedia policy suggests that links to sites that possibly infringe copyright should, in most cases, be removed: the link in the Albumbox to [A Rant A Day] is to a page which uses (presumably) copyrighted material, the album cover for Songs of Jane, as its background image.

I'd suggest leaving its review in, as it gives another POV to any readers, but perhaps the link should be removed? Someone could just quote one sentence of the review to give the point of it, though...

EvocativeIntrigue 17:32, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Songs About Jane.jpg
Image:Songs About Jane.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Other songs (I didn't know there was already another post on this talk page with that title, so I am changing this title)
I'm not into this band, but I noticed this page on the recent changes board. While I investigated, I also noticed some suspicious material. First off, what is the purpose of the "other songs" section? Second off, I seriously doubt that a Maroon 5 song is called "Pleasure F**ker", because an anonymous person posted that information on there and re-posted it as they reverted an anti-vandalism bot. I think I will remove the latter, and I recommend someone do something about the "other songs" section. A list of "other songs" has no proof of notability, save that one song which supplied a soundtrack for a video game, which could be placed elsewhere. Maybe the other songs section could be deleted entirely? Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 02:49, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

There is a song by Maroon 5 called "Pleasure F**ker" that has never appeared on any of their albums; however, I'm a bit puzzled as to why it was ever mentioned on this page as it has never been associated with "Songs About Jane". Beckerbuns (talk) 06:31, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Songs About Jane
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Songs About Jane's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "RIAA": From List of music recording certifications:  From O.A.R.:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Songs About Jane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060321193956/http://www.eonline.com:80/News/Items/0,1,15643,00.html to http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,15643,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers. —cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 18:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

2003
I may understand Harder to Breathe being 2002 (even though I saw it for the first time the following year), but I know I saw the video for This Love in 2003. I remember seeing the video again in January 2004 and thinking "this is going to be remembered as a 2004 song now, isn't it?" (best proof I got), because that's what happens when a song is released late in one year and held over into the next. I swear I saw the video and heard the song in 2003; otherwise I wouldn't have thought that. I mean, why would there be one song released in 2002 then every other song is released in 2004? It's very boggling to me. One of those things that makes me question my reality. 24.113.50.45 (talk) 09:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)