Talk:Sonic Forces/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 01:28, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * 'Hedgehog Engine' just redirects to 'Sonic Unleashed', which is linked in the same sentence in the lead
 * Unlinked.
 * 'spin and drop dashes' - can you briefly explain what this means to the reader? Perhaps mention what White Wisps are as well
 * Explained everything.
 * 'weapons known as Wispons,' - so just to clarify, Wispon is just the in-game term for 'weapon'?
 * Pretty much.
 * 'Doctor Eggman attacks a city' - does the city have a name?
 * It has three names; I didn't want to chose just one. The levels are called "Ghost Town", "Sunset Heights", and "Park Avenue".
 * 'Hedgehog Engine 2' just redirects to 'Sonic Unleashed' as well. At least link it to the development section at that article
 * Changed target.
 * 'featuring the "Sanic Hegehog" internet meme' - this needs explaining
 * Explained.
 * Wikilink Screen tearing
 * Done.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * There's no point in listing the publisher and the work where both are exactly the same. I.e Techno Buffalo Techno Buffalo', 'VG247 VG247'
 * Fixed.
 * At least one of your references gives SiliconEra a capital E, the others do not
 * I can't see any references that use Siliconera with a capital E. I gave the references a good look but can't see it.
 * Dissident93 ended up fixing it shortly after I finished my review. :) Freikorp (talk) 21:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The 'August 31, 2017' twitter reference needs additional parameters
 * Added some more parameters.
 * I'd archive more of your sources before they inevitably start rotting, but that isn't a GA requirement
 * I'll get to that soon.
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Looks pretty good overall. Placing on hold until issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 01:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Think I've resolved everything. Responded above. JOE  BRO  64  12:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm happy for this to pass now. Freikorp (talk) 21:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)