Talk:Sonnet 59

Untitled comment
I think this article deserves better rating. It can doubtlessly be improved upon by a Nobel laureate but even the October 2010 version is a fine example of of depth, width and wit.  [removed duplicate WikiProject Poetry template] --Xover (talk) 08:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC) Sintermerte (talk) 16:38, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * WikiProject Poetry has specific assessment criteria for A-Class. If you believe the current quality assessment is wrong you should probably follow the procedure outlined on the project's assessment page. Note particularly that re-assessment should be implemented by changing the  parameter in the existing template, rather than by adding a new instance of the template with the altered rating. I've taken the liberty of removing the extraneous template invocation from your above comment as it was causing some technical issues. --Xover (talk) 08:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)