Talk:Sony Alpha 230

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Page moved to Sony Alpha 230 - I'll have a look at the others...  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Sony a230 → Sony α 230 — Naming consistency with other Sony α cameras. Apalsola t • c 14:15, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh the can o' worms that has been opened. Oppose per WP:MOSTM.  Title should be Sony a230 or Sony Alpha 230.  All others should be moved too.   —   AjaxSmack   00:52, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose all of them should be renamed to Sony Alpha xxx per MOS:TM. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 03:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose per above, specifically the WP:MOSTM bullet point stating: "Avoid using special characters that are not pronounced, are included purely for decoration, or simply substitute for English words". cab (talk) 05:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Moving all the other articles is fine, too. My point was that the naming should be consistent. I vote for Sony Alpha xxx style naming. --Apalsola t • c 12:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I am of the exact same position as AjaxSmack. Sony a230 or Sony Alpha 230 and the closing admin should take care to ensure that all the Sony alpha cameras are moved as everyone appears to agree that it should remain consistent.--Labattblueboy (talk) 20:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Weak flash
"Standard" yes, but it has been downgraded from earlier standards. It is pretty weak - GN10 or something. It also doubles as AF light, which is great to scare away wildlife. --88.75.236.255 (talk) 08:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)