Talk:Sophitia Alexandra/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 00:48, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:

Lead


 * 1) Should have some more info on development
 * 2) Xiphos is only in the infobox
 * 3) Athens, Greece is only in the infbox
 * 4) Aya Takemura is only in the infobox
 * 5) Her voice actresses is only in the infobox

Conception and design


 * 1) Like with Voldo, should clarify that it's not unique that she was worked on solely by one team
 * 2) "for male fans. It would also be a terrible change" this is a little confusing; it sounds like they're saying it didn't happen.
 * 3) I think I addressed everything, how's that?

The changes to the stuff I listed looks good. I got some more now:


 * 1) Unsure about how RS is done with merch; would it be reasonable to have only merch cited by an RS? Also, is souledge.jp reliable?
 * 2) That's honestly the best source I have for the merch sadly, a lot of times it isn't covered. SoulEdge.jp however was Namco's own website for the game before they took it down.
 * 3) Reception should be paraphrased somewhat more
 * 4) Fixed I think?
 * 5) The voice actresses aren't mentioned in the article; is there no info regarding their performances?
 * 6) Should be fixed now.
 * 7) Infobox image looks a bit scuffed, and the rationale could be improved a bit.
 * 8) Replaced and redid rationale.

Looks good.