Talk:Sophorolipid

Article problems
Wikipedia is not for touting your own research. Please be objective (as any real scientist should), and try to remove your own opinions and superlatives from future posts and give equal weight to equal discoveries. Also, get some lessons on english grammar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.136.242.30 (talk) 18:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

this page is also not the place to continuously bash rhamnolipids. That can be done on the rhamnolipid page (haha). But seriously, the repetitive illusion that all rhamnolipids are potentially dangerous because some of them can be produced by a pathogenic strain of pseudomonas? Lets stick to the facts and not play politics with our biosurfactants. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.136.142.40 (talk) 20:36, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:04, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Sophorolipids → Sophorolipid – per WP:SINGULAR. 71.185.32.196 (talk) 13:06, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.