Talk:Sotra Bridge/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:15, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:16, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I made a number of copy-edits. I feel that more could be done, especially if you plan to take this article further. However, I feel it now meets the standards.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I assume good faith for sources, which my lack of knowledge of Norwegian means I cannot examine thoroughly. I believe that the sources are reliable and I find on evidence of original research. The article is adequately referenced.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough, without unneccessary detail.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images check out
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, this article meets the standards for listing sufficiently and so I am happy to list it. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:52, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to review the article and for the copyedit :) Arsenikk (talk)  07:00, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, this article meets the standards for listing sufficiently and so I am happy to list it. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:52, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to review the article and for the copyedit :) Arsenikk (talk)  07:00, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to review the article and for the copyedit :) Arsenikk (talk)  07:00, 2 March 2011 (UTC)