Talk:Soul Food Taqueria/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. The article reads very well. I have only a few comments, which I will list below. I may add comments later. (I fixed some punctuation throughout your article. See MoS: Quotation marks - Inside or out. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 16:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * "Despite little or no considerable amount of commercial success,..." - think you perhaps meant to leave out "considerable amount of"?
 * "Most of the instrumentation during recording was employed by Guerrero,..." - needs rewording
 * "The musical style of Soul Food Taqueria has been noted by music writers as taking inspiration from the..." - maybe not be grammatically incorrect, but is clumsy and could be improved. e.g. Music writers noted that the musical style of Soul Food Taqueria was inspired by...." or words you prefer.
 * wikilinks needing disambig: Baja, Vibe, Jupiter
 * Two Non-fair use images of the cover are not justified in the article. See Non-free content criteria.

Article placed on hold for now. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 16:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Fixed

I edited the article. What do you mean by the last comment? Dan56 (talk) 18:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you mean the question of whether the fair use of both the front and back covers are justified? What is your justification for using both? &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 02:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I asked for the opinion of other GAN reviewers regarding the use of the front and back album covers. They felt the use of both covers was unwarranted without extensive discussion of the specific covers. Therefore, if you keep both covers the article will violate NFCC and NFCC of the Non-free content criteria and therefore fail GAN. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 20:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

They support the artwork section of the article. Dan56 (talk) 20:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC) &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 01:52, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * You have a uncited quotation: "So what is a soul food taquería? Do you get a side of collard greens with your menudo?"
 * I have asked for a second opinion twice on this issue. The last one confirmed that two fair use images are a violation of the fair use rules. Therefore, if you insist on retaining two images of the album cover, I will have to fail the article.

I fixed it up good. Dan56 (talk) 04:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * My fault
 * Thanks for understanding Wikipedia's position regarding copyrights. &mdash; Mattisse  (Talk) 15:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

Another good article. Congradulations! &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 15:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable  c (OR): No OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Sets the context b (focused): Remains focused on subject
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: