Talk:Source Interlink

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Source Interlink is a reasonably significant magazine publisher. True, it's no Conde Nast or Hearst, but considering that there are about 15 magazines with articles on Wikipedia that are published by Source Interlink, I believe that having an article about the publisher is warranted. Also, I intend to put some more work in to clean it up. &mdash; Astonmartini (?) 23:55, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

list of magazines
A recent edit implies (without any supporting citations) that this company is defunct, and deleted a long list of "Current US publications and digital assets".

I feel that even if the company does become defunct, that the list of publications should stay in this article (perhaps with some sort of notation indicating what other organization each publication was tranferred to, if any). (I'm not really an expert in this area; I stumbled across this article via Help desk ).

I suspect that this company is not defunct; it has merely changed its name to something else (and made the corresponding changes to its website URL). If so, perhaps we should follow the Moving a page process to move this article to the company's new name, perhaps discussing the name change in the "history" section of the article.

Is there a good reference/source for this company's renaming or going defunct? ( User:Shortride, do you have any references? ) --DavidCary (talk) 04:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)