Talk:Source Tags & Codes

<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>

 * All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 17:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

does anyone else feel that the article should at least mention their pitchfork rating and the whole "pitchfork effect" nonesense? it certainly did stir up quite a bit of commotion amongst the indie scene when they got a 10. 07:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC) bing
 * I think that is noteworthy, yes. --Kvaks 19:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC)


 * It certainly needs to be expanded and properly expounded upon (with sources, of course) to warrant its continued presence in the article however. As it stands, there are no details regarding this purported stirring that this caused (although, being from Pitchfork, I have no doubt that it did indeed ruffle more than a few feathers) and people like myself, who are still quite new to Trail of Dead are certainly going to be interested in as many details as can be procured. C. M. Reed 21:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:And You Will Know Us by the Trail of Dead-Source Tags & Codes (album cover).jpg
Image:And You Will Know Us by the Trail of Dead-Source Tags & Codes (album cover).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SourceTags&Cods.jpg
Image:SourceTags&Cods.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

"controversy arose in the indie music community"
I removed this unsourced piece of info: Some controversy arose in the indie music community when music web site Pitchfork Media gave the album a perfect 10.0 score in its review. .

If you have sources, put it back in. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 18:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

genre
Could we work on the genre section? I'm not sure what genre I'd necessarily put them in, but just having "hard rock" seems misleading. After all, the band sounds a lot more like Husker Du than the Faces. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.224.246.146 (talk) 07:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)