Talk:South African War Memorial (South Australia)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:13, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks heaps for reviewing the article! Hopefully I've taken care of the problems:
 * In regard to the overlinking and missing comma, I've fixed both. (I seem to recall stupidly removing the comma at some point - no idea what I was thinking). :)
 * I've also got no idea how I managed to miss the missing word in the lead, either. Thanks for picking it up.
 * In regard to cite book, I checked, and they should all be good now. The two books are Inglis and Cameron. Richardson's "The National War Memorial, Adelaide: an historical study" is a bit odd, as it is a report rather than a book: probably best compared to an honours thesis. So I've used cite paper as the only template that I thought was appropriate, rather than cite book. The others are all journal articles, websites or newspaper articles, so they shouldn't be problem.
 * Thanks again for taking the time to go over the article - hopefully I've fixed the problems you identified, but if I missed something just let me know. :) - Bilby (talk) 22:27, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank to Bilby for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)