Talk:South Island School

Intro
I just managed to start this article for everybody. Please add more information to the stub.

spoon@sis.myschools.net

Please add more contents to this page, please. I would be overjoyed. Thanks for your co-operation.

User:spoonsy

Personal data/opinion that does not reflect the article should not be included. --Spoonsy 12:34, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

External links in faculties
Should the links in the faculties be external or link to Wikipedia pages? I've changed them to internal but I'm open to discussion. - jlao   0  4  01:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Neutrality
I think this article isn't neutral as it is written from students' POV, not an outsider's NPOV. Examples include the food prices and the activites sections. I am adding a disputed POV.- jlao   0  4  02:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Notable Graduates
Adding a list of notable graduates would be a good idea. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.44.5 (talk) 10:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Protection
due to the amount of vandalism on this article, i think it should be semi protected.

I suggest that this article should only have pending changes protection, as it has not been that frequently edited in the past. As you can see in this table, the main difference is that unregistered users can edit, but their edits will not appear to users who are not logged in until approved by a reviewer. Threedotshk (talk) 05:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

November 2020 major edit
In response to the edit made in November 2020: this edit deleted three-quarters of the article's content, including all information after November 2012. Instead of just deleting this content, it would have been much better to reword these sections to remove the bias, and include links to other sources instead of just the school website. In particular, this information was properly referenced and also contained contributions from other users. I would appreciate any further comments on this issue before doing a rollback to the latest version before this edit.

Threedotshk (talk) 13:44, 12 December 2020 (UTC)


 * agreed, content, if it's still relevant, should be kept and, if necessary, amended for clarity and conciseness. Maybe one of us can go through the older stuff and restore whatever is still suitable for the article. Kdm852 (talk) 11:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Sure thing! Thanks for offering to help. I have contacted the person responsible for the edit, but given that it's Sunday night here, I don't expect them to respond for at least the next few days. Threedotshk (talk) 13:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC)