Talk:South Luffenham

Criticism of style
Cloptonson (talk) 19:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Six years on from the message at the head of the article, most of the content is still unsourced. I have raised a citation need for the listing of Agnes Maude Royden among the Notable People section because her own article does not mention South Luffenham. A demonstration of connection like having lived there is needed.
 * Much of the details about past events are undated. There is mention of something occurring "A few years ago" - a few years ago as of what year when that was written into the article?
 * Some sections have only a minority of their content fitting the section headings, for example "The War" (better expressed as the specific war dealt with), from which I have split off new sections on Tunnels and Tailbys Field, Quarries, Water Supply and School that more closely reflect the contents.
 * To section I have headed School could do with an updating mention of education provision in the present day to follow on from the detail on the 19th century now ex=school building and former reading room - is there a school in the village now or do local children go to schools in another village or town?