Talk:South Sydney High School

Changes Since Fitzpatrick's Appointment
This whole paragraph is not notable -- I'll remove the paragraph within a week if there are no objections Australian Matt 14:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Bold edits
There have been several large edits occurring on this page, using wasteful grammar and removing links to other pages. Please do not do such edits without first discussing the necessity for such changes. I would like to refer all editors to:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Cheers Stravin (talk) 04:33, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but there is nothing to discuss here in my humble opinion. Your changes to the article make no sense. Please read WP:OWN and move on for copy editing. Ottre 05:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

my arguments have at least some merit. I quote: "Since working on an article does not entitle you to "own" the article, it is still important to respect the work of your fellow contributors. When making large scale removals of content, particularly content contributed by one editor, it is important to consider whether a desirable result could be obtained by working with the editor, instead of against him or her—regardless of whether or not he or she "owns" the article."

therefore we should find a compromise that does not damage the fabric of the article. Thanks Stravin (talk) 15:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Community consensus:


 * Is there a reference to show that the government does not provide funding?
 * The colours are still Green, Red, and Yellow? Or was that vandalism?
 * If the school was founded for boys, why remove the word "today"? I suggest a second sentence.
 * The second paragraph is awkward. The tree planting sentence, in particular. Involves at least two independent clauses. Do you know what type of trees have survived?
 * Can you get a photograph of said front lawn?


 * Ottre 16:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)