Talk:South Western (rail franchise)

If in the end the new franchise turns out to not have the name South Western, please can someone move\merge this into the correct article. Simply south 16:03, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

AfD

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

move to South Western (rail franchise) for the time being (see Thryduulf's comment below). This page will become a disambig page. — Mets501 ( talk ) 19:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Requested move
South Western → South Western Trains – This is rather odd. The original South Western was a rail franchise. It is often referred to and recognised as this. It is not quite a company yet until Feb 2007. The reason for the move is so that is does not get confused with compass directions, as i saw with Southeastern. But then again... Simply south 21:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Survey
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~

Discussion
Add any additional comments

Do we know yet how it will be branded? There seem to me to be a few possiblities: If nothing has yet been announced, then I suggest an interim name of South Western (rail franchise). Thryduulf 08:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The South West Trains name will continue (as First Great Western did at the start of the Greater Western franchise_, in which case we should probably merge this article into South West Trains and update the Island Line article accordingly.
 * The services of SWT and Island Line will be branded South Western Trains, in which case the article should be at South Western Trains
 * The services will be branded South Western, in which case the article should be at South Western (train operating company) to match Southeastern (train operating company).

In their bid, i misread it so that Stagecoach's bid was "Stagecoach South Western Trains Ltd". See: Bids. Simply south 11:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * See also though the first sentence of the First Great Western article - "First Great Western is the operating name of First Greater Western Ltd". The legal name is not always the same as the operating name (cf. 'one' and London Eastern Railways Ltd). The article should be at the most common name, i.e. the operating name. Thryduulf 12:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Where now?
what should happen to this article now etc etc? Simply south 16:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Perhaps integrate anything new into South West Trains, maybe creating a section called "Franchise renewal". Then redirect this article to that. MRSC • Talk 09:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I'd suggest that this is re-named into "Stagecoach South Western Trains", which is the absorbed name for SWT and Island Line, which are still running under their respective brandnames... Tubechallenger 15:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)