Talk:South of Heaven

GA review comments
some minor comments but otherwise a well-written article:
 * ...they "couldn't top Reign in Blood and whatever they recorded would be compared to that album, he stressed they "had to slow down" which...: where is the closure for the first braces
 * I've fixed this. Good eyes for spotting this. LuciferMorgan 17:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


 * avoid one line paragraphs (Recording section, first para)
 * I've merged that first paragraph with the second. LuciferMorgan 17:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


 * "notching up appearances on the following; the .." - shouldn't it be "in the following" ?
 * Not that I'm aware. For DVDs it may be true, possibly, but wouldn't be correct for CDs. "On" could cover both formats, but not "in". LuciferMorgan 17:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

--Kalyan 17:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

South of Heaven: Thrash or sludge?
An edit I did based on TV Tropes information was reverted. Here be proof that South of Heaven is sludgier than most Slayer albums. --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 00:31, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * You can't quote a wiki styled site that fails WP:RS criteria as a reference for proof of anything. Only valid references from sources which pass WP:RS can be used as a reference. The Real Libs-speak politely 00:42, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * That's one reason why we have the contradict template: to point out (without references) any place where an article contradicts itself. For example, slowed-down tempos do NOT equal thrashing. Clearly someone on Wikipedia hasn't listened to any of the album. To see TV Tropes's point, please see the third example of Did Not Do The Research on the page provided. --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * And another thing: what do you mean Amazon's unreliable!? --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 01:35, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * How a non-reliable source that was edited by yourself could be used here? What makes Amazon.com a reliable source?--  C  anniba loki  02:09, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't edit that page until after I saw that so-called "non-reliable source"! --Ryanasaurus007 (talk) 02:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't edit it either. Also, on TV Tropes, I use only one account, as since 2005, all my accounts created since then are assimilated into one single account, which happens to be called "ryanasaurus0077". --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 03:28, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * To "convince" me, you must create a section Musical style, and then describe through examples of sources that I gave you, how this album sounds musically.--  C  anniba loki  03:47, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Heavy metal in the infobox
I'm adding Heavy metal to the genre field since this albums to slow and Doomy to simply have Thrash metal as the sole genre. I call the big one bitey (talk) 7:37, October 23 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, we can't accept this. It's just your opinion.--Malconfort (talk) 20:28, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

TFA
Have any of the significant contributors to this page considered nominating it for TFA?  Rob van  vee  19:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)