Talk:Southern Cross Expedition

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Southern Cross Expedition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091120185714/http://www.heritage-antarctica.org/english/forgotten-explorer/ to http://www.heritage-antarctica.org/english/forgotten-explorer/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091120185702/http://www.heritage-antarctica.org/english/forgotten-expedition/ to http://www.heritage-antarctica.org/english/forgotten-expedition/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:40, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Images
There has been (I don't know when) some rather over-enthusiastic addition of images, creating a rather unsightly clutter. Four images crammed into the lead section was particulary egregious. I have restored some sort of order to the article. Some of the added images were better than the originals, so I've kept these, but generally, I've reduced the number, relocated others, and hopefully restored a tidiness to the article's appearance.

May I suggest that, if an editor wishes to add an image, they don't just stick it in without thought to the presentation of the article? Images are supposed to illustrate, not dominate the text. There's always a case for adding better images, when they become available, but often this needs to be by replacement, rather than addition. Brianboulton (talk) 22:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)