Talk:Southport Sockmen

None of the reference links work.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Southport Sockman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090211151842/http://lookback.merseyblogs.co.uk:80/2009/01/southport-sock-fetish.html to http://lookback.merseyblogs.co.uk/2009/01/southport-sock-fetish.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 30 June 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Favonian (talk) 22:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Southport Sockman → Southport Sockmen – Offenders were plural, so Sockmen not Sockman ... Current article title is inaccurate, as there were two perpetrators, so it should be Sockmen, not Sockman. Mjks28 (talk) 22:47, 30 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Support seems like a no-brainer. Orange sticker (talk) 09:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Support I checked a couple of the cited refs and they appear to agree. ResonantDistortion 17:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.