Talk:Southwest Airlines Flight 345

Deleted page has been userified
User:Mareklug/Southwest Airlines Flight 345

Everyone is invited to edit it and improve it. With more NTSB/Southwest Airlines developments, the article may well become unquestionably notable and merit restoration to mainspace. --Mareklug talk 15:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

At the time of the AFD, there were multiple comments that it was not a hull loss. 3 years later, I see references that it was a hull loss. Maybe not days after the crash but it was. Therefore, it seems reasonable that the article is now ok for publication. Usernamen1 (talk) 02:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Insurance hull loss is not the same thing! The aircraft was definitely repairable!!! i have resurrected the AfD which still holds--Petebutt (talk) 01:43, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Petebutt, you can't resurrect an old AfD page that has closed, you need to start a new one if you want the current version of the article to be deleted. It explains this in the comments of the AfD box you added, the relevant part of which starts The nomination page for this article already existed when this tag was added. The instructions of how to proceed are right there. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (can be redirected to Southwest_Airlines) --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:42, 22 August 2016 (UTC)