Talk:Southworth House (Cleveland, Ohio)/Archive 1

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Southworth House (Cleveland, Ohio). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081121164252/http://www.cheslergroup.com/properties/southworth.asp to http://www.cheslergroup.com/Properties/southworth.asp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090105174325/http://www.cheslergroup.com/historical/southworth.asp to http://www.cheslergroup.com/historical/southworth.asp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081228055622/http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/ohn/news/26May2005.htm to http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/ohn/news/26May2005.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090309023423/http://www.laborers860.com/about.htm to http://www.laborers860.com/about.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009011623/http://www.city.cleveland.oh.us/around_town/city_highlights/landmarks/designatedlandmarks.html to http://www.city.cleveland.oh.us/around_town/city_highlights/landmarks/designatedlandmarks.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090105174325/http://www.cheslergroup.com/historical/southworth.asp to http://www.cheslergroup.com/historical/southworth.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

The article meets Good Article criteria for the following reasons:
 * Per WP:V, the article has reliable sources.
 * Per WP:NPOV, the article's prose is presented from a neutral point of view.
 * Clearly written, in good prose with correct spelling and grammar.

I would, however, suggest that more images be added to the article. Keep in mind:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

Great job improving the article thus far; we need more "short" articles such as this. Congratulations. United Statesman (talk) 00:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)