Talk:Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute

Merger
I think all these short stubs need to be merged into one article. Bearian (talk) 21:57, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

article incomplete, copyvio, advertisement
I think there needs to be more about the organisation itself not just a presentation of their work. Like how many employees, how is the institute financed? --Wuerzele (talk) 04:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Looking into this further, this is an almost complete word for word copy from the corporations website, consisting of primary sources only: the only secondary sources are not ABOUT the SWF institute, but just using their info. I will flag this article for copyvio and advertisement. maybe notability isnt even established. --Wuerzele (talk) 03:32, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20111217014119/http://www.swfinstitute.org/about/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It seems to me that all copyright violation has now been removed. Does or anyone else see more? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Justlettersandnumbers, thanks, agree.--Wuerzele (talk) 06:09, 9 August 2014 (UTC)