Talk:Soviet calendar

WikiProject Time assessment rating comment
Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.

—Yamara ✉  15:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Discussion
Has anybody ever seen such a colour coded five-day calendar?--145.254.156.95 18:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Big chunk of info lost
Joe Kress ,

During the rewrite you have lost time period 1918--1929. Please restore. `'Míkka>t 02:56, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The part of the old article which originally discussed the adoption of the Gregorian calendar is at the beginning of the section Soviet calendar. Nothing else about the period 1918–1929 appeared in the original article—nevertheless, I added significant information about the national holidays during that period in Soviet calendar. — Joe Kress (talk) 03:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Soviet calendar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070121144021/http://www.niv.ru/library/006/001.htm to http://www.niv.ru/library/006/001.htm
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20120712090601/http://personal.ecu.edu/mccartyr/Russia.html to http://personal.ecu.edu/MCCARTYR/Russia.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:28, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Dr Zhivago
In the novel he mentions his "nine days of work and his one day of rest", implying a ten day work week. The author seemed to think this was commonly understood and needed no explanation, there was not even a footnote for Western readers, which had been included on other Soviet topics that might be unfamiliar to them. 2600:1000:B162:36B8:0:6F:EF39:5201 (talk) 22:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

The top of the article literally has no external sources
The top of the article literally has no external sources. Brauxljo (talk) 17:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

"Erroneous reporting of '30-day months' is an opinion
This section should be headed and the lede phrased in a way to present the conflict among sources, not to proclaim which are factually correct and which are in error. 2001:5A8:4615:6B00:A0A6:7402:B669:676 (talk) 22:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * There is no "conflict among sources". There was no '30-day months'. Whoever reported those, were misguided. - Altenmann >talk 23:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC)