Talk:Soviet cruiser Krasny Krym/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Bernstein2291 (Talk • Contributions • Sign Here) 02:49, 9 March 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Bernstein2291 (Talk • Contributions • Sign Here) 03:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * What references does the second link in the Links section have?
 * It wouldn't load for me, so I just deleted it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Is there any more information about its post WWII service?
 * No, and that's what's annoying. Even Russian-language sources don't have squat about its post-war service.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Considering that it's a thorough as it's ever going to be, I'm going to pass it. Bernstein2291 (Talk • Contributions • Sign Here) 03:59, 9 March 2011 (UTC)