Talk:Soviet destroyer Smyshlyony (1940)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 07:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 07:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)


 * refugees and bombarded Axis troop positions Link Axis.
 * Done


 * Smyshleny struck a Soviet mine on 6 March 1942 and sank Link Soviet Union.
 * Excessive, already in infobox
 * I think we should link the Soviet Union in the lead too.
 * Done.


 * Smyshleny (Russian: Смышлёный, lit. 'Clever') Unlink Russian.
 * Done


 * displacing 1,727 metric tons (1,700 long tons) at standard load Link both tonnes.
 * Done


 * and 2,279 metric tons (2,243 long tons) at deep load Link deep load.
 * Done


 * designers expected would exceed the 37-knot (69 km/h; 43 mph) speed Link knots here.
 * Done


 * Anti-aircraft defense/AA guns is overlinked.
 * Done


 * Anti-aircraft defense was provided by a pair of Add "(AA)" after Anti-aircraft.
 * Done


 * as well as four 12.7-millimeter (0.50 in) DK or DShK machine guns round the in here.
 * Done


 * No commissioned part in the body?
 * 'Accepted' in the body is one of several Russian equivalents to commissioned


 * Infobox says 8 March while the body says 7 March?
 * Done


 * Odessa is overlinked.
 * Done


 * in response to a report of Romanian destroyers leaving the port Pipe Romanian with the Kingdom of Romania.
 * Linked to a more relevant article instead


 * the German invasion of the Soviet Union, on 22 June 1941 Pipe German with Nazi Germany.
 * That would be overlinking, Germany is too well known.
 * Not Nazi Germany. I do not think that former countries should be included in this rule. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:00, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Done.


 * No OR.

Infobox
 * "1,727 t (1,700 long tons)" Link both tonnes.
 * "54,000 shp (40,000 kW)" Link kW.
 * Both done

Images
 * File:Unidentified Project 7U in the Black Sea.jpg This is strange since when had the US soldiers in the Black Sea in WWII?
 * Likely taken by US naval attache

Sources That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:32, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me they're also reliable and academic.
 * I think I'll pass it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 20:10, 20 September 2019 (UTC)