Talk:Soviet submarine K-85/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 10:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

I'll take a look at this shortly. Harrias (he/him) • talk 10:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Don't forget about this--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry Sturm, I haven't been around much, but will try and get this done soon. I've done a first read of the article, and honestly, it'll be some minor tweaks at most, it's in good shape, as expected. Harrias  (he/him) • talk 11:59, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @Harrias are you still intending to complete this review? It has been 3 months. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Images

 * 6a. Symbol confirmed.svg Both images are suitably licensed.
 * 6b. Symbol confirmed.svg Both images are relevant and suitably captioned.

Prose

 * 1a. Symbol confirmed.svg No prose issues relevant to the GA criteria; the 'Construction and career' gets a bit stilted occasionally, but nothing major.
 * "The number of expensive nuclear-powered (Echo-class submarines) that it could afford.." The sentence should still be readable without the part inside the brackets, so I would recommend rewriting slightly as "..of expensive nuclear-powered (Echo-class) submarines that it could afford.." or similar.
 * 1b. Symbol question.svg A couple of consistency queries:
 * In the prose the article says "The submarine was renamed B-124..", while in the infobox, it says "Renamed	B-85". I assume this is just a typo in the infobox?
 * Similarly, the prose says "and a draft (ship) of 6.29 meters (20 ft 8 in)", while the infobox says "3.29 m (10 ft 10 in)".


 * 3a. Symbol confirmed.svg All fine, more detail would have been nice in the 'Construction and career' section, but I guess we just don't have the details, so the article is sufficient.
 * 3b. One query:
 * "Unlike the later submarines of the class, K-68's hull was built from non-magnetic steel and was not covered with anechoic tiles." This feels superfluous to this specific article, being about a different boat. If you want the details about the hull design, I'd recommend including it without talking about K-68.
 * 4. Symbol confirmed.svg No issues or concerns.
 * 5. Symbol confirmed.svg No issues or concerns.

Sorry for the long delay on this one. Nothing significantly up with this, just a few minor queries really. Harrias (he/him) • talk 12:34, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Don't sweat it. See if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 07:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
 * All raised issues resolved, I'm now content that this meets the GA criteria. Harrias  (he/him) • talk 10:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC)