Talk:Sozin's Comet/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi. I'm going to review this GAC. Intothewoods29 (talk) 22:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi again. I just have a couple of questions that I would like answered before this is promoted.


 * You need a non-breaking hyphen in the lead (I think).
 * In the third section, you say they chase Azula to the Fire Capital, where she's gotten rid of the Dai Li. I haven't seen the movie, but aren't the Dai Li in the Earth capitol? I just want to make sure that the facts are straight.
 * The Dai Li went to the Fire Nation capital with Azula. This was revealed during "The Day of Black Sun." She then says she can't trust them because they betrayed Long Feng, and she fears the same will happen to her. Rau's Speak Page 22:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, in the critical reception, you write "IGN reviewer Tory Ireland Mell noted that there "was something terribly wrong...not only was this the greatest animated movie I'd ever see, I'd seriously put it in the top ten films of all time"." Am I correct in understanding that the thing that was wrong was that it didn't recieve the adequate recognition? If so, that should be specified.
 * Yea, it was a pretty weird opening statement. How about removing the "something terribly wrong" comment, it still reads fine and is a bit clearer. Rau's Speak Page 22:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Other than that, everything seems fine! I was a little worried that the article would not be general enough for readers unfamiliar with the series, but there are more than enough wikilinks throughout the article.

Contact me on my talk page when you've answered the questions! Sorry if they're silly, but I just want to make sure I cover all of my bases! Intothewoods29 (talk) 22:25, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Haha just ignore what I said about the hyphen... I think I fixed it. Don't ask! ;) I also just deleted the beginning part of that quote and left the end; I hope you don't mind. Well, I think that this is a GA! The criteria:

1.well-written, organized, flows well, wikilinks 2. reliable refs 3. relevant sections and material 4. NPOV 5. stable 6.pics all have tags!

Thanks for your speedy response! I'm going to promote this to GA Status! Intothewoods29 (talk) 23:01, 6 August 2008 (UTC)