Talk:SpaceX Starshield

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://spacenews.com/spacex-providing-starlink-services-to-dod-under-unique-terms-and-conditions/ https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/09/spacex-starshield-gets-first-us-space-force-contract.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   06:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Explain the revert of changes
@Starwars54321 you appear to be using your sock puppet account Suprabellum to disguise reverts in order to bypass the multiple revert rule. You've now reverted the changes twice. You are in violation of that rule. Further you labeled them "restore some lost edits". Can you please explain yourself and why you were lying into the edit log? On your talk page you have been previously warned about edit warring on this page. Ergzay (talk) 22:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Starwars54321 Pinging as wikipedia didn't highlight the username. Ergzay (talk) 22:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Also technically what you are labeling as "edit warring" is not what occurred unless you are indeed agreeing that Suprabellum is also owned by you. The first revert by Suprabellum was made to look like an accidental change, after which I reverted what looked like a mistake. But you think that was a revert, not a mistake, which is curious. Then you did a full revert with this account but you instead called it "restoring lost edits" which is completely false. That was the first revert, but you didn't call it a revert either. So no there has been no "edit warring" other than that conducted by you. So, was it an edit war and you were lying, or was it innocent mistakes and not edit warring? Ergzay (talk) 22:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Apparently administrators agree so I'll go ahead and revert your changes given they were bad faith reverts. Ergzay (talk) 22:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Ergzay edits must be reversed
I believe @Ergzay good-washing this article by removing unpleasant facts from this article, comparing edits it is obvious and trivially verifiable from exactly people whom this is about https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SpaceX_Starshield&diff=1224518631&oldid=1223759775 moreover @Ergzay has spacex badge on his profile, to signal bias and incentive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MouseInDust (talk • contribs)
 * @MouseInDust When using talk pages please sign your comments with . As to my claimed "good-washing", on wikipedia please assume good faith rather than making personal attacks. And finally, as far as I'm aware everything I removed was either unrelated to Starshield or was provably incorrect as the wikipedia content was stating things not stated in the original source. For example of the two images you added back, one of them dates back to 2005, something entirely irrelevant, given Starlink started in the late 2010s at the earliest. If you want to make the claim that it started back in 2005, you need to supply sources that state Starhsield started back then, otherwise it is simply original research. Ergzay (talk) 17:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I concur, fixing his most egregious changes.. Catandmouse2 (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Catandmouse2 The changes I made were all because it was either WP:OR or other content not backed up by sources. Or alternatively it was content completely unrelated to the article. Ergzay (talk) 04:47, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You didn't "fix the most egregious changes" you reverted all of the changes wholesale simply labeling them "goodwashing". That's why you had to re-add back in the paragraph talking about this article: https://spacenews.com/pentagon-embracing-spacexs-starshield-for-future-military-satcom/ If you have issues with changes I made explain them. Ergzay (talk) 05:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

"Talk:SpaceX Starshield" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:SpaceX_Starshield&redirect=no Talk:SpaceX Starshield] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Ergzay (talk) 06:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)