Talk:Space Exploration Initiative

Refs
Refs for CLL:
 * http://www.aiaa.org/content.cfm?pageid=406&gTable=mtgpaper&gID=70310
 * http://www.sae.org/technical/papers/931599
 * http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991aref.nasa.....W
 * http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19930018770_1993018770.pdf

67.176.147.100 (talk) 17:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Stever
The article should explicitly mention the Stever-chaired Committee on Human Exploration of Space and its 1990 "Review of NASA's 90-Day Study and Alternatives". (sdsds - talk) 06:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Space Exploration Initiative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090114101114/http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codez/new/policy/pddnspd6.html to http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codez/new/policy/pddnspd6.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed Edit
Dear fellow editors,

Here is a brief piece that we can possibly add to the section:

Space exploration initiative The advisory group of the National Space Council (NSC) is trying to determine how the human exploration plans of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) can support space science. The Users’ Advisory group or UAG of the NSC established a think-tank in 2018 as a support system and currently working on space science, human space exploration, and possible synergies between these two fields. https://www.nasa.gov/content/national-space-council-users-advisory-group https://spacenews.com/space-council-advisory-group-to-study-role-of-human-space-exploration-supporting-science/

Thank you

LOBOSKYJOJO (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Another utterly irrelevant suggestion from this author. Have you even read the article? Andyjsmith (talk) 08:48, 23 January 2019 (UTC)