Talk:Space Marshals

GA Reassessment
Hello, I'm not entirely sure this is up to GA standard. For starters, here's a summary of the references:
 * 1) PixelBite isn't listed on WP:VG/S, and taking a quick look at it, it doesn't seem like it's too reliable.
 * 2) Pocket Tactics is in the same boat, although looking at the about us page shows some promise.
 * 3) Appzine is possibly unreliable. I can't find their about us page.
 * 4) The iClarified reference should probably be replaced with something more reliable
 * 5) Gamer.nl has been debated a few times and there doesn't seem to be a sound consensus surrounding this website.
 * 6) Ref11 is a primary source, which could probably slide due to it being used in the development section, but a better reference would be better.
 * 7) Ref18 is a primary source, can this be replaced?
 * 8) Mutliplayer.it isn't reliable.
 * 9) iPad Insight is a blog and is probably unreliable.
 * 10) Not entirely sure on Redmond Pie.

 Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   12:19, 24 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Ouch. I don't know much as video games reliable sources, so I don't think if I can help.Tintor2 (talk) 15:04, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * , contrary to what you seem to imply here, just because a source isn't listed at WP:VG/S doesn't mean it's unreliable. I don't have time to go through this list in depth right now, so I'll be sure to look at them when I get home. However, just from a quick look, I can address the first point. You might not have realized this, but PixelBite is the developer of the game, so obviously their website is reliable as a primary source. As for your points about ref11 and ref18: nowhere in the GA criteria does it state that there can't be any primary sources in the article, so this is irrelevant.  Omni Flames ( talk ) 22:04, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I didn't say that if they're not on WP:VG/S they're immediately unreliable, there are a few references that aren't listed on WP:VG/S that are reliable, but if it's been vetted by the community and been listed as unreliable, the policy states to try not to use them. PixelBite was my mistake and I've since crossed it off the list. Primary sources are fine, although it'd be better if secondary sources covered the subject too. --  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   06:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * There are also a few parts of the article that could use a WP:GOCE copyedit. I'll list this as reassessment for more input; I could be entirely wrong about this.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   06:59, 26 August 2016 (UTC)