Talk:Space Marshals/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 01:43, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Okay, I'll be reviewing the article. It looks in good shape but there are some things that seem like issues: Anyways, the article looks in good shape. I'll happily pass it after seeing if you fix the issues.Tintor2 (talk) 01:43, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The lead has several references. See Manual of Style/Lead section. If what is written in the lead will be repeated in the body, then I would recommend removing the references unless you are adding controversial information which many users might change.
 * ✅  Omni Flames ( talk ) 03:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The development section uses two citations for most sentences. Are all needed?
 * ✅ (mostly). I've kept some where I feel that two references is still helpful.  Omni Flames ( talk ) 03:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Reception: I recommend rewritting the first sentence to "The game received mostly positive reviews from critics, having a score of 82 out of 100 in Metacritic"
 * ✅  Omni Flames ( talk ) 03:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Could you also give credit to the critics in the Reception like saying "IGN's reviewer praised." This might help expand the paragraphs which seem a little small.
 * ✅  Omni Flames ( talk ) 03:52, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Time is a magazine so I think it should be given italics.
 * ✅  Omni Flames ( talk ) 04:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The review box could be expanded to notice the other websites reviewing the article like Touch arcade with " | agg1     = | agg1Score = " (See Template:Video game reviews.
 * ✅  Omni Flames ( talk ) 04:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. I've fixed all the errors you brought up.  Omni Flames ( talk ) 04:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Good job. Passed the article.Tintor2 (talk) 14:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)