Talk:Speak Now World Tour – Live/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sebbirrrr (talk · contribs) 18:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Placeholder.

Infobox and lead

 * Use bullet points instead of plainlist for the length
 * "is a live album" → is this Swift's first, second, third, etc. live album?
 * "DVD or Blu-ray" → shouldn't it be "and" instead of "or"?
 * It was released on either DVD or Blu-Ray. Ippantekina (talk) 15:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)


 * "save for two" → not sure what this is supposed to mean
 * "save for" means "except"; it is a vocabulary used in the Slant article. Ippantekina (talk) 15:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

✅ Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The sentence describing the tracks is quite long, try to split it
 * "was supported by" → from the way it is worded it suggests that "Long Live" was released to promote the album
 * "Brazilian singer-songwriter" → I recommend sticking with just "Brazilian singer" as it doesn't seem Fernandes is known for being a singer-songwriter
 * "has sold 368,000 copies" → as of?
 * "additionally entered the top 30 on charts in Australia—where it was certified triple platinum by the Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA), Canada, and Japan." → try to reword, it sounds like it was also certified in Australia by Canada and Japan (?)

Background and release
✅ Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Ref 7 doesn't state that the album was released in Asia (maybe only in India?)
 * Not sure how ref 8 states that it was released in Europe

Content

 * Keefe's comment sounds more like a (critical) review of the album
 * Trimmed a bit. Ippantekina (talk) 15:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

✅ Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Critical reception

 * The Newcastle Herald is a tabloid, I don't think it should be used for album reviews
 * Tabloid here means the format, not gossip journalism. Ippantekina (talk) 15:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * That's fine then. However, looking at The Daily Telegraph article, I doubt that it is a reliable source considering it was at one point the least trusted newspaper in Australia Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * "found the CD rather typical" → I think "typical" should be in quotes
 * "but said that "Ours" was disappointing" → McDonnell found "Ours"'s performance disappointing, not the song itself
 * In the context of the live album I think mentioning "Ours" suffices as its live recording. Ippantekina (talk) 15:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Alright. Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * According to the ref, Carlos Olivares Baró is the reviewer for Notimex

Commercial performance
✅ Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Saying that peaked within the top 30 is enough, the peaks don't have to be put in brackets

Charts
❌ The chart performance table for the songs should be removed. Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The ref for Japan's peak position is dead
 * Not sure why the songs's chart performance is included here as they can be found at Taylor Swift singles discography instead

Release history

 * Shouldn't there be one of these as it was released for different formats?
 * I think mentioning the release dates in the prose is enough. Ippantekina (talk) 01:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Understandable. Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

✅

Certifications
❌ Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't the heading say Certifications for Speak Now World Tour – Live ?

Outcome

 * for 7 days; article needs just a few tweaks! Sebbirrrr (talk) 20:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! May I ask more than 7 days because I’m on a trip? I’ll ping you right away when I’m back. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 05:47, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * That's fine. Enjoy your trip! Sebbirrrr (talk) 14:32, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks so much for the review and your patience. Except where I responded, I have addressed your comments. Let me know if this article needs further work asap, because I might not be able to reach back after the weekend. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 01:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Don't worry! Thanks for addressing my comments. There are two points that were not addressed and I left a comment about one of the sources under Critical reception. Greets, Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I have addressed the two remaining points. Regarding the Australian Telegraph, I removed it based on the many controversies it received; its sensationalism is reminiscent of the Daily Mail. Hopefully the article is in good shape now! Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 15:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good now. Great job with this one! Sebbirrrr (talk) 15:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)