Talk:Speaking in Tongues (Talking Heads album)

Fair use rationale for Image:Talking Heads - Speaking in Tongues.jpg
Image:Talking Heads - Speaking in Tongues.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC) -->

Rauschenberg
Technically this was original research - I went and looked at mine (yeah, I'm so cool). It's not a picture disc, so I sort of described it in the article. Huw Powell (talk) 00:19, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Incorrect Track Lengths
Aren't some of the track lengths quite wrong? A bit of arithmetic demonstrates the listed lengths don't add up to the given album length in the album info box. I'm going off the track lengths given here: http://www.we7.com/#/album/Speaking-In-Tongues-w-Bonus-Tracks-!albumId=166501. Granted, this is a bonus track remastered edition, but it's unlikely they put in different song takes or anything like that. I propose this be corrected unless an explanation can be given for why there is such a disparity. The Coj (talk) 03:23, 16 November 2009 (UTC)


 * it's unlikely they put in different song takes or anything like that
 * Actually, that's sort of what happened. When the album was released, the running lengths of some songs were shorter on the LP than they were on cassette. The first CD release used the LP-length songs but subsequent CD issues have used the longer cassette versions. I don't know the source of the track lengths used in the article, but it's possible they're from the original LP (or the initial CD) and the website has the latest CD track lengths. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:00, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * That's interesting, thanks for clearing that up. With this in mind then should something not be changed in the article? So that at least the album length given in the info box and the total of the added track lengths match up. Perhaps even including two seperate album length values marked as LP and CD reissues, and/or in the track listing section state that all times refer to the original LP release. What are your thoughts? The Coj (talk) 14:13, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Singles
The article mentions that "Burning Down the House" was a substantial hit single, and that "This Must be the Place" was also released as a single. The Chart Performance section only includes an entry for "This Must be the Place". Is there a reason for this? Did "Burning" predate the album, or could no-one find a reference for the song's US chart position? I would fix it myself, but the omission seems too obvious to be an accident. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 12:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Speaking in Tongues was released on June 1, 1983. "Burning Down the House" was released in July 1983. I have added its chart place with a source. Thanks. 86.187.227.246 (talk) 18:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC)