Talk:Speech is silver, silence is golden/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 06:26, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. Hopefully we will start soon. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:26, 16 May 2021 (UTC) 

Observations

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * The link to Megillah 18 is not a link. The correct link appears to be to Brewster's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable.
 * Reading Wasserstein on page 257, it is not directly clear about the attribution to Santob de Carrion.


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Please show references and text for Al-Raghib al-Isfahani and the 9th-century writer Al-Jahiz


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:


 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Page created on 27 October 2020
 * Page has receive 67 edits by 13 editors
 * 90 day page gives tally of 6511 daily views, with an average of 72 views per day
 * Page considered stable, no edit wars noted


 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Sartor resartus; = public domain: copyright has expired, often because its first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1926


 * 1) Overall:
 * May we attend to the issues raised above? --Whiteguru (talk) 10:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , Quick clarification: what do you mean by "Please show references and text for Al-Raghib al-Isfahani and the 9th-century writer Al-Jahiz? This is referenced to Wasserstein's article, pages 244–247.


 * As for Megillah, this wasn't added by me. I don't understand this term and I asked the editor who added it, User:Paulaszi0, to clarify it, but they are not very active. If they don't reply I guess we can revert their addition. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:25, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I found the mention of Brewster in the source cited. If you can simply follow that and update the reference? Thank you. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , Forgive me, but I don't track, maybe I am tired. Can you link the page / source which mentions Brewster? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:43, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , Forgive me, but I don't track, maybe I am tired. Can you link the page / source which mentions Brewster? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:43, 19 May 2021 (UTC)