Talk:Speechless (Michael Jackson song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cavie78 (talk) 10:13, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): (yes):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): (citations to reliable sources):  (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Good work Pyrrhus, the article is well written and comprehensive, in many ways the perfect GA song article. I have a small number of minor concerns so I'll put the article on hold for now until they're dealt with. Cavie78 (talk) 10:13, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments

 * 1) "In the production of "Speechless", Jackson collaborated with musicians such as Jeremy Lubbock..." I think this could be worded better - I was unsure what you meant on first read through. Would suggest changing to something like "Jackson collaborated with musicians including Jeremy Lubbock ... during the production of "Speechless"."
 * 2) There should be alt text for the cover image.
 * 3) "Nikolas Markantonatos of The Daily Collegian in Massachusetts expressed that one could "nearly feel Jackson's energy bursting through the seams..." Expressed is the wrong word, change to "stated"? "suggested"?
 * 4) Suggest linking "digitally edited" to Digital audio editor and "mixed" to Audio mixing (recorded music) in the 'Writing and recording' section
 * 5) In my opinion it would be good to include the fact that the music clip features the track's chorus in the description so that users know what they're listening to.
 * Thanks for taking the time to review the article. I believe I have addressed all of your concerns. Thanks,  Pyrrhus  16 ''' 14:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Excellent, have now promoted! Cavie78 (talk) 14:17, 28 April 2010 (UTC)