Talk:Spelter

2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 08:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Status
Possibly this article should become a redirect to zinc, but that leaves the problem of the places called Spelter (at present only red links). I do not know how to deal with this. On the other hand, if zinc has been used for sculpture there should be an articel on it. Peterkingiron 14:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Picture is pretty useless
This picture is pretty useless for an article on Spelter. If there is any spelter at all in the picture it's by coincidence. It's just one of millions of British fields, with some slag in it. It's not enlightening, educative, informative or even fun! A picture of a spelter works would be very interesting WHILE IT ACTUALLY EXISTED!!! A pic of a site where there used to be something relevant..? Is this a joke?

I hope the guy didn't make an expedition out just to photo this site, and was walking his dog. Just take a look, see what you think. Is it what you'd imagine in an article like this? It's like an article on cotton with a cornfield in it, cos they used to grow cotton in that field 80 years ago.


 * 84.67.116.161 (talk) 23:12, 6 February 2023 (UTC)