Talk:Spencer MacCallum

Commercial links
Isn't the second link labled "Mata Ortiz website" a commercial link? Isn't there a rule against commercial links? I'm not sure about the rule but if my understanding is correct, the link should be removed.

http://www.solmarimports.com

Joekoz451 15:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

mataortiz.com, ortizpots.com, and solmarimports.com are ALL commercial sites that appear in both "Spencer MacCallum" and "Mata Ortiz" articles. If one is removed, shouldn't all be?

The only one that is objective/not commercial is Spencer MacCallum's Mata Ortiz Calendar at www.mataortizcalendar.com


 * And while you're at it delete all those commercial links on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Coca-Cola_Company The point is people aren't supposed to start pages for their personal commercial gain. When OTHER people consider you news worthy, notable, historically significant, etc. to create an article about you, their linking to commercial sites is fine.
 * Carol Moore 17:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)User:Carolmooredc User talk:Carolmooredc

Limon Real??
I couldn't find that he was involved in that; did he merely influence the author? Why is it in the list? Also, since this was a short and unreferenced article with bibliography I left it that way, though usually do references. Carol Moore 00:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)User:Carolmooredc User talk:Carolmooredc

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spencer MacCallum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071215022008/http://home.arcor.de/danneskjoeld/F/E/T/CommunitySHM_.htm to http://home.arcor.de/danneskjoeld/F/E/T/CommunitySHM_.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)