Talk:Spencer Sutherland

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... There is no copyrighted material, the subject (Spencer Sutherland) is relevant, there is no vandalism, there is no vandalizing for spam, the tone of the BLP is responsible and there are reliable sources given, there are secondary sources Mchailosky (talk) 22:10, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The sources given all amount to announcements (either by Sutherland himself or by the bands he's supporting) of various events. Sutherland has not yet reached a point in his career where he meets the criteria for inclusion at Wikipedia. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

There are sources from third parties (newspapers, radio stations). He has "reached the point in his career where meets the criteria for inclusion" as you can see from his various performances, producers, and his signing with a modeling agency. Deleting the page doesn't make sense as the sources are reliable and secondary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mchailosky (talk • contribs) 15:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

STRONG KEEP. Article got blanked and redirected in 2019 and that should not have happened. It failed speedy delete in 2015 and never went through AFD. Pretty clear that this meets notability criteria and has sufficient non primary refs that pass the "subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works" criteria. Reverted the redirect and the preceding edit that claimed to have "fixed false info" but in reality just deleted verifiable content. Added refs for that content. Ggpur (talk) 08:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)