Talk:Spermatocytogenesis

Merge proposal
This material could be covered in the main article of Spermatogenesis without losing any detail.Trashbird1240 (talk) 17:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

The section "Spermatocytogenesis" should be merged with "Spermatogenesis" because it is impossible to separate the two topics. Spermatogenesis does not exist with spermatocytogenesis. Stages of spermatogenesis does not exist without spermatocytogenesis.

I would also like to propose that the subtopic, "Spermatidogenesis" be dropped and the short content be merged into the subtopic, "Spermiogenesis." My reason for this recommendation is the following: 1. There are 2,219 references in PubMed, when searching for "spermiogenesis' in the title/abstract 2. There are "0" references in PubMed, when searching for "spermatidogenesis' in the title/abstract 3. The following manuscript are written by experts in the field and use the term "spermiogenesis' Rexhess (talk) 18:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Rex A. Hess

Link
What am I seriously supposed to do? Linking to Gametocytogenesis which is disambiguation page. Should I remove the link? 117.198.178.102 (talk) 16:29, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * My advice is just to leave it like that - while this is discouraged, WP:IAR appears to apply here. Mdann52 (talk) 16:36, 17 June 2015 (UTC)