Talk:Spermula

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 08:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Spermula.jpg
Image:Spermula.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Article accuracy
The article is completely false and appears to be meant as a joke. But this is Wikipedia, and jokes belong elsewhere. "Spermula" is not a great movie, but it is a little more serious than this article misleadingly claims.

149.99.96.228 (talk) 02:11, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Review copyrighted material
The review must be re-written. It's taken word-for-word from the book Immoral Tales: European Sex & Horror Movies, 1956-1984 By Cathal Tohill, Pete Tombs ISBN: 9780312135195 K8 fan (talk) 04:07, 3 February 2013 (UTC)