Talk:Sphaleron

unobservably rare?
A strange choice of words.

Doesn't this play into proton decay and don't the known limits on proton instability place a firm limit on this?

Hcobb (talk) 03:38, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Ungrammatical sentence, doesn't make sense.
"A baryon net excess can be created during the electroweak symmetry breaking can be later preserved only if this phase transition was first-order." This sentence (Second bullet in main content) is ungrammatical and confusing. I don't know enough about physics to correct it, but one of the can be phrases has to be wrong - or there are two thoughts jammed together. Perhaps just delete the first can be?

Trelligan (talk) 19:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC) ''Clumsy me - overwrote the first entry above. My apologies''
 * let me se: "A baryon net excess that is created during the electroweak-symmetry-breaking can be later preserved only if this phase transition was first-order. Look good?Sinsearach (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 06:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

IMPOSSIBLE to represent by a feynman diagram? NO WAY
There can be no way this is impossible, for instance in a 3D or even 4th-D(video) feynman diagram.Sinsearach (talk) 13:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC)