Talk:Sphinx Head/Archive 1

Comments
I don't understand why this article would be considered for deletion. If you have any suggestions for how to make it better please post them here. Cornell1890 (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The biggest issue I would see for this article is the list of notable alumni. If you look at some of the pages regarding freemasonry, and its appendant/concordant bodies, we have tried to limit those lists to only a very few, specifically looking at those who are notable because of their membership, or their activities which relate to their membership in the group.--Vidkun (talk) 18:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

GA
I've remove the article from WP:GAN because it is more of a list than an article. If you want to, you can nominate it at WP:FLC.
 * I disagree with this.

Simply removing an article from the nomination queue for a reason that has not been established as a quick-fail criterion is irregular, which has a knock on effect on the trustworthiness of the Good Article nomination and evaluation process. I've made further remarks here. EyeSerene has opened a Good article review page as well. Please join the discussion there. Thank you. Gosgood (talk) 17:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) The article was nominated in good faith.
 * 2) It has been in the queue for a long time
 * 3) It does not obviously quick-fail.
 * 4) In light of that, it should remain on queue until such time that an editor can evaluate the article fully in connection with the good article criteria and render a decision in accordance with those criteria.

GA Review of Sphinx Head
Following the discussion on the Good Article Reassessment page, there is general agreement that a misunderstanding has taken place, that articles should depart from the nomination queue only after an evaluation has taken place and has been published on a subpage. I am undertaking that review now. Accordingly, I am taking the extraordinary steps of reverting EyeSerene's edits to restore the GA nominee template and establish a review page, which will be transcluded to this section here. Apologies to the editors awaiting an evaluation for so long now. Thank you for your patience. Gosgood (talk) 15:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

What's this group's connection to the Dartmouth College society with a similiar name? I suggest breaking the link between the two entires, unless someone knows something unreported in either entry. SLY111 (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)SLY111

Assessment comment
Substituted at 06:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)