Talk:Spinning Around/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Prism (talk · contribs) 14:56, 25 December 2013 (UTC)


 * General details
 * Disambiguation links: Not present.
 * Checklinks: Correct these external links.
 * There was one issue and I have fixed it --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

1. Lead section
 * Original research: Not present.
 * In depth
 * Last paragraph: "lead" → "led" (I think, please correct me if I wrong, since my English isn't perfect, or near that)
 * No no you are absolutely right. Corrected --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

2. Reception
 * 2.2. Critical reaction
 * Perhaps you should include more reviews of the song. Here's one from Blogcritics and other from NME; though if you consider they are unnecessary, feel free to keep the section as it is right now.
 * Those are great reviews! Thank you for providing them to me! I've included them now --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

5. Formats and track listings
 * I'm not sure if you can use Eli.com as a reliable source, though they always have correct information on promotional singles and releases, so keep it.
 * Even I thought so, but then again the information is indeed correct. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

6. Charts & 7. Certifications
 * You could just merge the two sections, insert the certifications table in the section and put it under a level 3 section 'Certifications'. Oh, and change title of Charts to 'Charts and certifications'. If you disagree with me though, just tell me.
 * Merged. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Final comments
 * This article is very well done and was an interesting read. Once these tiny issues are corrected I'll pass it, though, you should consider nominating it for FA. Prism   △  14:56, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Wow, thank you so much! I have addressed the issues now. I think I will put it up for peer review sometimes later and then FA nominate it. Thank you for the review and suggestion! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for passing! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:55, 25 December 2013 (UTC)