Talk:Spinoloricus cinziae

Meantime no authority reference ?
What is the authority reference for this species? According to articles in BMC Biology it is mentioned as "Spinoloricus nov. sp." meantime. Did Danovaro told the scientific name to BBC only meantime? --Snek01 (talk) 16:48, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm somewhat concerned by the fact that virtually all the news stories refer to the species as Spinoloricus Cinzia [yes, with a capital C], which makes me suspect that the "official name" is premature. If no confirmation in reputable sources appears within the next week or so, we should probably move the article to "Spinoloricus sp. nov. 'Cinzia'" or similar. Hqb (talk) 18:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * FWIW - I *Entirely* Agree - Seems The Title Of This Wikipedia Article May Be Incorrect Based On The Original Cited Reference - The Alternate Title, "Spinoloricus Cinzia", Seems Correct (See Reference) But The Main Title, "Spinoloricus sp. nov.", Should Be Corrected To (or at least include?) "Spinoloricus nov. sp." Instead? - Based On The Original Cited Reference? - In Any Case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 16:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

✅ - Renamed/Moved Article to the correct title ("Spinoloricus nov. sp.") - from the incorrect(?) title ("Spinoloricus sp. nov.") - This is a new procedure for me - Help in correcting any resulting "renaming/moving/redirect" problems would be appreciated of course - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 20:52, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Cellular innards
"Innards"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.48.191 (talk) 15:24, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Size
How big is it? 86.179.125.181 (talk) 09:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I believe about 150 micrometers long. the image on the side has a bar that is 50 micrometers (though not explained well in this article). — Soap — 14:07, 17 April 2022 (UTC)