Talk:Spirit Squad/Archive 1

what are these guys finishers, i know that one has a leg drop other than that they just doing multi-team moves


 * We won't know until they do their finishing moves. Also, please sign your comments on talk pages by appending ~ . Darryl Hamlin 17:31, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Partial Credit: WrestlingObserver.com

The Spirit Squad will be splitting up as a group now. The members were informed of WWE's decision on RAW last night.


 * Not true, I could not find it on that site, but I found it on other wrestling rumor websites that accredit it with WrestlingObserver.com. WrestlingObserver.com HAS NOT posted this on their main site, or their members only site. Those sites are wrong, they pass on rumors that are not true as news.

Cman 01:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)


 * It is possible this is true, the highlanders have issued a challenge for the titles and it is rumored that they will win with the help of DX. The reason the spirit sqaud had the titles in the first place was because RAW had no tag teams really. Big Show was going to be sent to ECW to help build it up so Kane and Big Show tag team was to disband.

Finishers
this i sad. why cant there just be a link to high spirits? it is a move that does not have an entry in the move list. it should be there. second, its not a feint knee drop. he tucks his legs back and then does the leg drop. just a fancy version of it. it isnt a feint knee drop. im at least changing that much.
 * it doesnt have an entry because it isnt a double team move and your edits are unhelpful to the article and will be reverted each time --- Paulley

Winning WWE World Tag titles
Who edited it to say that the Spirit squad won the title at 2005 Taboo Tuesday is WRONG Big Show and Kane won then last year not the Spirit Squad they won them on Raw durring April of 2006. Overlordneo 04:21, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Breakup
Why were the details of the group's breakup removed?
 * Because they're still teaming on house shows. «»bd(talk stalk) 01:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Listing Members' Current Gimmicks in Intro
This section is regarding the placement of the sentence "Former members of the Spirit Squad, Nicky and Mikey reformed in Ohio Valley Wrestling and called themselves The Frat Pack." at the end of the introduction to the article. I feel this is irrelevant but Bdve feels otherwise. I think it's irrelevant because that section of the article is the introduction. It's intended to give you a brief history of the subject and why they are noteworthy. The current gimmick of two members is not that important. I'm not denying that fact's placement in the body of the article, but it does not belong in the intro, especially when it's already stated in the body. Furthermore, there's no mention of Kenny's singles career. Or Johnny's cameo on RAW. Or whatever Mitch is up to.

I also argue the poor placement of this based on fact itself. We're talking about OVW. We have no idea how long that will last and a lot of casual visitors who are casual WWE fans don't even know what OVW is. Lastly, I would like to note the precendence in the pages of other tag teams. The Rockers doesn't mention Shawn Michaels singles career or what Marty Jannetty is up to. The APA doesn't mention JBL emerging as a character or Ron Simmons saying "Damn" on RAW.

There is no reason for this sentence to be in the intro when it fits perfectly well in the body of the article. WikiFew 06:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

To add to my points, I checked the History of the article to get a better understanding of the opposing arguement and it seems to be based on the thought that the Frat Pack is an extension or revival of the Spirit Squad. I don't think this is the case at all. From the limited OVW I've seen, the Frat Pack was shown as stereotypically arrogant jocks in a frat. This matches their pictures the OVW site. This doesn't match the Spirit Squad at all, beyond the collegiate timing. WikiFew 06:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:High-Spirits.jpg
Image:High-Spirits.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

NOT ALL 5 MEMBERS RELEASED!
Not all 5 members have been released. It says that in the article. Nick"Nicky" Nemeth is wrestling on RAW right now as Dolph Ziggler. Can somebody please change it. Nathan 930 (talk) 23:48, 28 December 2008


 * I've corrected the sentence. I have not heard of Nemeth's release, so until WWE reports it, he remains a part of the WWE Roster. --KnowsSoaps (talk) 06:32, 29 December 2008 (UTC)