Talk:Spit (album)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tbhotch (talk · contribs). Almost a year in the queue. 07:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for starting a review on this article. I thought that the article would never get reviewed. Anyways, what are some things in the article that should be fixed? Statik N (talk) 19:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * These:

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

These are the main issues that I found. Article on hold. ©  Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 23:09, 7 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Citation 21 doesn't need an issue or volume because it doesn't have those. It's a book. Some of the citations that don't have an issue or volume or page doesn't have issues, volumes, or pages because I couldn't find them. Citation 32's last name is actually spelled as "vanHorn". As for the obscenity controversies in music category, there's the quote in the body: "Spit was controversial because of its song titles, which made many people think that the album's songs are about sex". Statik N (talk) 00:56, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * For Citation 32 I was referring to a title, not to vanHorn. I was about to approve the GAN, nevertheless, this suddenly happened. I cannot approve an article with an edit-war and the release dates are unsourced (except for "Paperdoll" that is supported by source 40). Resolve the conflict, and ping me when it's done. ©   Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 01:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * By the way, Backrish and Charlotte charted on the UK Top 100. This can be mentioned. ©   Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 01:57, 9 September 2017 (UTC)


 * All single dates are now sourced. I sourced "Charlotte" in the body. Statik N (talk) 02:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * OK then. Article approved. Good work. ©   Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 04:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC)