Talk:Splackavellie

I once received a compliment on my Splackavellie work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kapuchinski

I'd like to keep something in about it being a portmanteau. If someone is looking up Splackavellie, they are thinking "What does that mean?" Let us not deny them information.

I am quoted here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pinikas

Kapuchinski (talk) 23:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * On your Splackavelli work? You might want to read WP:COI.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 00:58, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Looks like we already took it to the talk page.
Considering I'm more invested in this information than you, leave it. Kapuchinski (talk) 04:55, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that’s not how it works. Adding something back without addressing the problem doesn’t help your case.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 19:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * On second thought, in the original discussion, you didn’t actually do anything to prove your case; the only real justification you seem to have is that you were mentioned on someone else’s talk page; that hardly qualifies as a reliable source.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 19:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)