Talk:Spray foams (insulation)

Requested move 17 August 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved. The consensus seems to be to merge into spray foam. If someone wants to undertake that. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 10:16, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Spray foams (insulation) → Polyurethane foam insulation – That is the actual scope of the article, as detailed in a template on the article page. HLHJ (talk) 14:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. No such user (talk) 09:26, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

References 1-6 and 10 are non-notable, non-neutral, marketing materials. Possibly SEO spam?


 * Alternative proposal. Why not just Polyurethane foam, which currently redirects to List of polyurethane applications? Apart from insulation, the foam is used for a related but distinct purpose: as a door and window sealant. Slightly expanding the scope would easily accommodate that use as well. The article is in a pretty bad and spammy shape, though. No such user (talk) 09:26, 24 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Alternative proposal. Merge with spray foam.  Half of that article is already about insulation spray foams.  —  AjaxSmack   02:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge with Spray foam.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  20:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Health effects section
Why was the section on health effects removed? Was it removed by someone with an interest in producing and marketing spray foam?

Hi, User:209.122.115.103. I take it you mean this edit. You could put it back yourself. If no-one else has edited since a bad edit, you can go to the history tab and click on "revert", type the reason, and you're done. The refs in it are dead, but there appear to be good refs for the health effects online, so it would be easy to improve. I've added the medrefs template to ask for help finding good refs. I've also tagged the whole article for balance. HLHJ (talk) 14:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)